Match statistics snapshot
- UTC Cajamarca fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Academia Cantolao was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
- UTC Cajamarca held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 324Lead | Accurate passes | 289 |
| 428Lead | Total passes | 388 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 18Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.