Match statistics snapshot
- Cusco created the clearer chances on xG (0.67 vs 2.60, Δ 1.93).
- Cusco fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Cusco held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 0.67 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.60Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 228 | Accurate passes | 407Lead |
| 292 | Total passes | 465Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.