Match statistics snapshot
- FBC Melgar fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- UTC Cajamarca was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 18%).
- FBC Melgar held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 53% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 104 | Accurate passes | 314Lead |
| 195 | Total passes | 425Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.