Match statistics snapshot
- FBC Melgar fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- FBC Melgar was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 30%).
- UTC Cajamarca held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 329Lead | Accurate passes | 222 |
| 404Lead | Total passes | 307 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.