Match statistics snapshot
- UTC Cajamarca fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
- Sporting Cristal was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 26%).
- Sporting Cristal held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 12Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
| 5 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 9 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 251 | Accurate passes | 420Lead |
| 299 | Total passes | 479Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1Lead | Red cards | 3 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |