Match statistics snapshot
- UTC Cajamarca fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Sporting Cristal was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 18%).
- Sporting Cristal held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 59% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 123 | Accurate passes | 374Lead |
| 207 | Total passes | 475Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |