UTC Cajamarca vs Sporting Cristal
Key events
View all- L. Iberico
- G. Paredes
Predictions & odds
View allModel outlook versus market-implied chances (overround removed from decimal odds). For entertainment and analysis only — not betting advice.
Model blend
Estimated outcome mix from Sportra's pre-match model
- UTC Cajamarca10%
- Draw45%
- Sporting Cristal45%
Prematch market
Source: William Hill
- UTC Cajamarca26.1%
- Draw26.9%
- Sporting Cristal46.9%
Live market
No in-play odds snapshot was captured for this match.
Venue
- Surface
- artificial turf
- Capacity
- 18000
Match
- Referee
- Jordi Espinoza
- Round
- Clausura - 11
- Date
Competition
- Country
- Peru (PE)
- Season
- 2026
- Dates
- 2026-01-30 → 2026-11-14
Match statistics
View allKey metrics
Visual snapshot of possession, chance quality, and shooting.
Possession
Expected goals (xG)
Total shots
Shots on target
Team form & competition
View all- #18Position
- 15Points
- 4-8-18W-D-L
- 33/54Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 2-0 / 2-3
- Worst defeats
- 2-4 / 4-1
- #8Position
- 44Points
- 13-5-11W-D-L
- 53/42Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 5-0 / 0-2
- Worst defeats
- 1-2 / 4-1
Head to head
View allRecorded meetings: 19 (available previous meetings, not necessarily all-time).
- Highest scoring
- UTC Cajamarca 1–6 Sporting Cristal
- UTC Cajamarca most goals
- UTC Cajamarca 4–1 Sporting Cristal
- Sporting Cristal most goals
- UTC Cajamarca 1–6 Sporting Cristal





UTC Cajamarca created the clearer chances on xG (0.85 vs 0.56, Δ 0.29). UTC Cajamarca fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots). Sporting Cristal was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 24%). Sporting Cristal held more of the ball (53% possession).
UTC Cajamarca underperformed their xG by 0.8 goals (0 scored vs 0.85 xG). Sporting Cristal outperformed their xG by 0.4 goals (1 scored vs 0.56 xG).