Match statistics snapshot
- UTC Cajamarca created the clearer chances on xG (2.49 vs 0.85, Δ 1.64).
- UTC Cajamarca fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- UTC Cajamarca was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Union Comercio |
|---|---|---|
| 2.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.85 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Union Comercio |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 262 | Accurate passes | 266Lead |
| 340 | Total passes | 346Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Union Comercio |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Union Comercio |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Union Comercio |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.