Match statistics snapshot
- Almere City FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.73 vs 1.96, Δ 1.23).
- Almere City FC fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Almere City FC was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.73 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.96Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 297Lead | Accurate passes | 269 |
| 417Lead | Total passes | 372 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |