Match statistics snapshot
- Utrecht created the clearer chances on xG (1.02 vs 0.93, Δ 0.09).
- Almere City FC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
- Utrecht held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.93 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 215 |
| 473Lead | Total passes | 326 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.81 | Goals prevented | 0.81 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |