Match statistics snapshot
- Feyenoord created the clearer chances on xG (0.55 vs 4.11, Δ 3.56).
- Feyenoord fired more attempts (21 vs 5 shots).
- Feyenoord was more accurate in front of goal (52% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 0.55 | Expected goals (xG) | 4.11Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 331 | Accurate passes | 445Lead |
| 416 | Total passes | 518Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utrecht | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.