Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (0.77 vs 3.24, Δ 2.47).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (24 vs 12 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 0.77 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.24Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 22Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 193 | Accurate passes | 616Lead |
| 269 | Total passes | 682Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |