Match statistics snapshot
- Fredrikstad created the clearer chances on xG (1.28 vs 1.49, Δ 0.21).
- Fredrikstad was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 31%).
- Valerenga held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 1.28 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 394Lead | Accurate passes | 275 |
| 490Lead | Total passes | 369 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |