Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam created the clearer chances on xG (0.64 vs 1.40, Δ 0.76).
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 0.64 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.40Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 244 | Accurate passes | 468Lead |
| 327 | Total passes | 548Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.43 | Goals prevented | 0.43 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 18Lead | Fouls | 23 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |