Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (0.36 vs 1.35, Δ 0.99).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (8 vs 7 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.36 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.35Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 362 | Accurate passes | 390Lead |
| 444 | Total passes | 477Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.