Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 1.32, Δ 0.12).
- Valerenga fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.32Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 357 | Accurate passes | 383Lead |
| 440 | Total passes | 459Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -1.59 | Goals prevented | -1.59 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Valerenga | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.