Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Valour was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 38%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Valour | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Valour | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 190 | Accurate passes | 438Lead |
| 273 | Total passes | 514Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Valour | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Valour | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Valour | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.