Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.31 vs 2.01, Δ 0.70).
- Vancouver FC fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Cavalry FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vancouver Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.01Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vancouver Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 344 |
| 497Lead | Total passes | 402 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vancouver Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vancouver Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vancouver Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.