Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver FC fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- HFX Wanderers FC was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 23%).
- Vancouver FC held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vancouver Fc | Statistic | Hfx Wanderers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vancouver Fc | Statistic | Hfx Wanderers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 389Lead | Accurate passes | 324 |
| 448Lead | Total passes | 400 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vancouver Fc | Statistic | Hfx Wanderers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vancouver Fc | Statistic | Hfx Wanderers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vancouver Fc | Statistic | Hfx Wanderers Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |