Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Vancouver Whitecaps was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 266 | Accurate passes | 538Lead |
| 329 | Total passes | 611Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.