Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Vancouver Whitecaps was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 294 | Accurate passes | 533Lead |
| 368 | Total passes | 597Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |