Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (2.25 vs 1.26, Δ 0.99).
- Vancouver Whitecaps fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2.25Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.26 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 407 | Accurate passes | 417Lead |
| 474 | Total passes | 488Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.08 | Goals prevented | 0.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |