Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (2.30 vs 0.74, Δ 1.56).
- Vancouver Whitecaps fired more attempts (13 vs 2 shots).
- Vancouver Whitecaps was more accurate in front of goal (69% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2.30Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.74 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 363Lead | Accurate passes | 243 |
| 443Lead | Total passes | 342 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |