Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (2.48 vs 0.70, Δ 1.78).
- Vancouver Whitecaps was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 33%).
- Portland Timbers held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70 |
| 6 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 2 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 375 | Accurate passes | 459Lead |
| 449 | Total passes | 537Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.58 | Goals prevented | -0.58 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |