Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (2.18 vs 1.02, Δ 1.16).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (18 vs 16 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2.18Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.02 |
| Offsides | ||
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 475Lead | Accurate passes | 298 |
| 527Lead | Total passes | 362 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.49 | Goals prevented | 0.49 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |