Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (1.77 vs 0.64, Δ 1.13).
- Vancouver Whitecaps fired more attempts (19 vs 3 shots).
- Vancouver Whitecaps was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.64 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 505Lead | Accurate passes | 332 |
| 563Lead | Total passes | 407 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.