Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (2.94 vs 0.94, Δ 2.00).
- Vancouver Whitecaps fired more attempts (19 vs 5 shots).
- Vancouver Whitecaps was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 2.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 547Lead | Accurate passes | 396 |
| 603Lead | Total passes | 467 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| 2.26 | Goals prevented | 2.26 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.