Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 0.66, Δ 0.32).
- Vancouver Whitecaps fired more attempts (12 vs 6 shots).
- Vancouver Whitecaps held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 459Lead | Accurate passes | 266 |
| 530Lead | Total passes | 331 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.76 | Goals prevented | 1.76 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vancouver Whitecaps | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |