Match statistics snapshot
- Ceara created the clearer chances on xG (0.92 vs 1.46, Δ 0.54).
- Vasco DA Gama fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Ceara was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 0.92 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.46Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 458Lead | Accurate passes | 233 |
| 506Lead | Total passes | 294 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.03 | Goals prevented | -0.03 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.