Match statistics snapshot
- Vasco DA Gama created the clearer chances on xG (2.02 vs 1.95, Δ 0.07).
- Vasco DA Gama fired more attempts (21 vs 17 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (59% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 2.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.95 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 456Lead | Accurate passes | 336 |
| 518Lead | Total passes | 392 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| 1.80 | Goals prevented | 1.80 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.