Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (0.85 vs 1.57, Δ 0.72).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Fluminense held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 0.85 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.57Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 333 | Accurate passes | 411Lead |
| 388 | Total passes | 475Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vasco Da Gama | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |