Match statistics snapshot
- AIK created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 1.80, Δ 0.69).
- AIK fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- AIK was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Växjö | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.80Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Växjö | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 363Lead | Accurate passes | 295 |
| 453Lead | Total passes | 382 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Växjö | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Växjö | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Växjö | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |