Match statistics snapshot
- Växjö created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 0.35, Δ 1.02).
- Växjö fired more attempts (15 vs 3 shots).
- Växjö was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Växjö | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Växjö | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 476Lead | Accurate passes | 267 |
| 592Lead | Total passes | 377 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Växjö | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Växjö | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Växjö | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.