Match statistics snapshot
- Linköping created the clearer chances on xG (1.27 vs 1.74, Δ 0.47).
- Linköping held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Växjö | Statistic | Linköping |
|---|---|---|
| 1.27 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Växjö | Statistic | Linköping |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 300 | Accurate passes | 511Lead |
| 383 | Total passes | 598Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Växjö | Statistic | Linköping |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Växjö | Statistic | Linköping |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Växjö | Statistic | Linköping |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 6 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |