Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico Tucuman fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Velez Sarsfield was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 6 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 311Lead | Accurate passes | 241 |
| 399Lead | Total passes | 342 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |