Match statistics snapshot
- Instituto Cordoba created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 3.51, Δ 2.53).
- Instituto Cordoba fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- Velez Sarsfield was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.51Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 427Lead | Accurate passes | 254 |
| 531Lead | Total passes | 357 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.31 | Goals prevented | -0.31 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |