Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 25%).
- River Plate held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 61% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 208 | Accurate passes | 426Lead |
| 343 | Total passes | 565Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.