Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate fired more attempts (19 vs 13 shots).
- River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 31%).
- River Plate held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 236 | Accurate passes | 416Lead |
| 320 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.