Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate created the clearer chances on xG (0.92 vs 1.16, Δ 0.24).
- Velez Sarsfield fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Velez Sarsfield was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 0.92 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.16Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 222 | Accurate passes | 294Lead |
| 327 | Total passes | 409Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 1.03 | Goals prevented | 1.03 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.