Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- River Plate held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 61% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 196 | Accurate passes | 444Lead |
| 321 | Total passes | 567Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.