Match statistics snapshot
- Velez Sarsfield fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Tigre was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 27%).
- Velez Sarsfield held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 358Lead | Accurate passes | 295 |
| 440Lead | Total passes | 386 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Velez Sarsfield | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.