Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Velo Clube | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
| OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | ||
| Shots inside the box | ||
| Shots off target | ||
| Shots on target | ||
| Shots outside the box | ||
| Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Velo Clube | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| Ball possession | ||
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Velo Clube | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| Corner kicks |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Velo Clube | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | ||
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Velo Clube | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| Fouls | ||
0 | Red cards | 0 |
3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Vila Nova leads this block
Vila Nova had the edge in 2 of 3 signals in this block.
Vila Nova leads (8.0 vs 6.0).
Even on this measure.
Vila Nova leads (4.0 vs 3.0).
