Match statistics snapshot
- Ventforet Kofu was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 15%).
- Buriram United held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ventforet Kofu | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ventforet Kofu | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 333 | Accurate passes | 460Lead |
| 443 | Total passes | 564Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ventforet Kofu | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ventforet Kofu | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ventforet Kofu | Statistic | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |