Match statistics snapshot
- Ventforet Kofu fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Ventforet Kofu was more accurate in front of goal (61% on target vs 20%).
- Hangzhou Greentown held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ventforet Kofu | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ventforet Kofu | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 246 | Accurate passes | 414Lead |
| 354 | Total passes | 517Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ventforet Kofu | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ventforet Kofu | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ventforet Kofu | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |