Match statistics snapshot
- Veres Rivne created the clearer chances on xG (1.79 vs 1.28, Δ 0.51).
- Veres Rivne fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- LNZ Cherkasy was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Veres Rivne | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 1.79Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.28 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Veres Rivne | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 222 | Accurate passes | 295Lead |
| 293 | Total passes | 351Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Veres Rivne | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Veres Rivne | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Veres Rivne | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.