Match statistics snapshot
- TSV 1860 München created the clearer chances on xG (0.71 vs 0.80, Δ 0.09).
- Verl fired more attempts (13 vs 5 shots).
- Verl was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Verl | Statistic | Tsv 1860 München |
|---|---|---|
| 0.71 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.80Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Verl | Statistic | Tsv 1860 München |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 512Lead | Accurate passes | 202 |
| 604Lead | Total passes | 286 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Verl | Statistic | Tsv 1860 München |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Verl | Statistic | Tsv 1860 München |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Verl | Statistic | Tsv 1860 München |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |