Match statistics snapshot
- Verl created the clearer chances on xG (2.80 vs 0.30, Δ 2.50).
- Verl fired more attempts (13 vs 5 shots).
- Verl was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Verl | Statistic | Tsv 1860 München |
|---|---|---|
| 2.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.30 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Verl | Statistic | Tsv 1860 München |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 550Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 627Lead | Total passes | 279 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Verl | Statistic | Tsv 1860 München |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Verl | Statistic | Tsv 1860 München |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Verl | Statistic | Tsv 1860 München |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |