Match statistics snapshot
- Verona created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 0.68, Δ 0.82).
- Verona fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Verona | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Verona | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 153 | Accurate passes | 477Lead |
| 242 | Total passes | 551Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Verona | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Verona | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.21 | Goals prevented | 0.21 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Verona | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |