Match statistics snapshot
- Verona created the clearer chances on xG (1.07 vs 0.85, Δ 0.22).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 27%).
- Como held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Verona | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1.07Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.85 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Verona | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 202 | Accurate passes | 442Lead |
| 277 | Total passes | 506Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Verona | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Verona | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.20 | Goals prevented | 0.20 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Verona | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.