Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (0.55 vs 2.70, Δ 2.15).
- Inter fired more attempts (20 vs 7 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Verona | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0.55 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.70Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Verona | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 26% | Ball possession | 74%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 162 | Accurate passes | 654Lead |
| 239 | Total passes | 712Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Verona | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Verona | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Verona | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |